Lunatics Advocate Backing Disastrous Syrian Strikes


This is a response to Michael Gerson’s absurd Washington Post article, “A stand for Syria — and Obama”. Article link: http://t.co/nuPBUcEQVu

Michael, your argument is patently absurd and totally erroneous. For congress to approve of Obama’s planned disastrous Syrian caper simply to save presidential “face” would be winning a skirmish, but losing the war. Obama’s thoughtless saber-rattling must not be rewarded. In addition, it would reinforce inept and reprehensible foreign policy. On the contrary, if Congress repudiates the Liar/bumbler-in-Chief, it will show the world that at least someone in our government has some common sense. Moreover, the will of the American people would finally be considered and realized. At some point, we may be able to elect a leader who actually is presidential. Someone with true dignity, honorable statesmanship, street-smart ethical intelligence, & steeped in proper American founding tradition. Likely a miracle, but those do occur periodically.

Best regards,
The Word Guru

I need and desire constructive comments of any kind, for they are a necessary educational and enlightenment process. Please visit the comment section at the bottom of this page and follow the guidelines for legitimate response.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Foreign Policy, Obama's subterfuge, Politics and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Please leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s